Specifics of Evaluating Social Media Marketing Effectiveness in the IT Sector

The study substantiates the need for a differentiated approach to evaluating social media marketing effectiveness for IT companies. The research is driven by the lack of methodologies that account for the specific characteristics of this sector, a gap that leads to the use of inappropriate metrics and ineffective management decisions. The article identifies and systematizes seven key industry factors that shape the specifics of evaluating social media marketing performance. A table outlining the application of unit metrics for various types of IT companies has been developed. Requirements for evaluating social media marketing effectiveness in the IT sector are formulated, taking into account factors such as the business model, the sales funnel stage, platform-specific nuances, and the necessity of integrating unit economics.

1. Batura M. P., Marakhina I. V., Parkhimenko V. A. (2025) Organizational Mechanism for Systematically Attracting New Clients to IT Companies Through Social Networks. Digital Transformation. 31 (1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2025-31-1-22-30 (in Russian).

2. Shainesh G. (2004) Understanding Buyer Behaviour in Software Services Strategies for Indian Firms. International Journal of Technology Management. 28 (1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.005056.

3. Kethuda O., Ayoubi R. (2024) Perceived Market Leadership and Customer Engagement for IT Companies in the Enterprise Software Market: Evaluating the Role of Social Media Marketing. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing. 33 (1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2024.2446812.

4. Ma L., Ou W., Lee C. S. (2022) Investigating Consumers' Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Engagement in Social Media Brand Pages: A Natural Language Processing Approach. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101179.

5. Trunfio M., Rossi S. (2021) Conceptualising and Measuring Social Media Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review. Italian Journal of Marketing. 2021 (3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-021-00035-8.

6. Batura M. P., Marakhina I. V., Parkhimenko U. A. (2025) Methodological Foundations of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of IT Companies' Work in Social Networks. Digital Transformation. 31 (2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2025-31-2-5-12 (in Russian).

7. Agrawal A., Sheoran N., Suman S., Sinha G. (2022) Multi-touch Attribution for Complex B2B Customer Journeys using Temporal Convolutional Networks. Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022 (WWW '22 Companion). Virtual Event / Lyon, France, April 25–29. 910–917. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487553.3524670.

8. Belozrov D. A., Belyaev N. A. (2018) Development of End-to-End Marketing Analytics for SaaS Solutions in the Business-to-Business Market (B2B). Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management. 12 (3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.14529/em180315 (in Russian).

9. Ghosh S. (2025) Startup Finance 2.0: Value Creation, Tokenization, and the Next Era of Startup Funding. New York, Productivity Press Publ. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003614067.

10. Madsen D. O. (2026) Parasocial Business: Platformed Authority and Organizational Influence in the Visibility Economy. Administrative Sciences. 16 (7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16070309.

11. Batura M. P., Marakhina I. V., Parkhimenko V. A. (2025) Principles of Functioning of Algorithmic Systems of Social Networks. Science and Innovations. (12), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2025-12-60-64 (in Russian).

12. Diorio S., Howarth R. (2024) The Four Cs of B2B Targeting: Using Company, Customer, Channel and Contextual Data to Shrink the Audience Bullseye. Applied Marketing Analytics: The Peer-Reviewed Journal. 10 (3), 227–244.

13. Neumann N., Tucker C. E., Subramanyam K., Marshall J. (2023) Is First- or Third-Party Audience Data More Effective for Reaching the 'Right' Customers? The Case of IT Decision-Makers. Quantitative Marketing and Economics. 21, 519–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-023-09268-7.