Model of Economic Cyber-Physical Space Focused on Improving National Competitiveness
https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2025-31-1-5-12
Abstract
The relevance of developing methodological foundations for national competitiveness in a global competitive environment is revealed. The practical significance of the development of economic methodological tools is substantiated, which makes it possible to simplify the conduct of situational analysis, modeling of national competitiveness, forecasting competitive strategies and evaluating their results. A scientific hypothesis has been put forward about the possibility of using indicators of the development of the national cyberphysical ecosystem to predict an increase in national competitiveness, which will allow prioritizing the object-object, subject-object and subject-subject economic components of it and evaluating the results of management decisions. A model of the economic cyberphysical space has been developed. As a function of increasing national competitiveness, the index of the intensity of the increment of digital capital in the country and its export is justified. As independent arguments, indexes have been developed that characterize the intensity of intermediate and final consumption of digital resources in the country's economy and their gross accumulation. Parametric economic dependencies are introduced.
About the Author
I. A. Zubritskaya
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus
Belarus
Zubritskaya Inessa Anatolyevna, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Marketing Department
220013, Minsk, Independence Ave., 65
References
1. Porter M. E. (2025) Competition: Translated from English. Moscow, Williams Publ. (in Russian).
2. Porter M. (2016) International Competition: Competitive Advantages of Countries. Moscow, Alpina Publisher Publ. (in Russian).
3. Fatkhutdinov R. A. (2000) Competitiveness: Economics, Strategy, Management. Moscow, Infra-M Publ. (in Russian).
4. Vorobyov I. P., Sidorova E. I., Lenskaya T. I. (2012) Cooperation and Competition. Minsk, Institute of System Research in the Agro-Industrial Complex of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus (in Russian).
5. Porter M. (2020) Competitive Advantage: How to Achieve High Results and Ensure Their Sustainability. Moscow, Alpina Publisher Publ. (in Russian).
6. Porter M. E. (2011) Competitive Strategy: A Methodology for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Moscow, Alpina Publisher Publ. (in Russian).
7. Gorbunov A. R. (2009) National Competitiveness: Strategic Modeling of Concerns. Moscow, Ankil Publ. (in Russian).
8. Shakleina T. A., Vodopyanov K. G., Yakovenko I. D. (2022) The Phenomenon of “Managed Global Competition” and Russia’s Interests: New Competition in the Arctic. Law and Management. XXI Century. 1 (62), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2022-1-62-17-29 (in Russian).
9. Nisnevich Yu. A. (2023) Political Administration VS Political Competition Under Neo-Authoritarian Rule.
10. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 25 (2), 397–422.
11. Zubritskaya I. A. (2019) World Experience in the Introduction of Technical and Technological Means of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Results of Economic Analysis. New Economics. (1), 80–90 (in Russian).
12. Zubritskaya I. A. (2022) Economics of Cyberspace: Structure of Cyber Capital. Fotinsky Readings – 2022: Proceedings IX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Izhevsk, May 26–28. Izhevsk, Publishing House of the Moscow State Pedagogical University named after M. T. Kalashnikov. 94–101 (in Russian).
13. Zubritskaya I. A. (2022) Digital Capital: New Economic Indicators. The New Economy. (2), 234–246 (in Russian).
14. Zubritskaya I. A. (2023) National Cyber-Physical Ecosystem: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects. Science and Innovation. (3), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2023-03-43-47 (in Russian).
15. Zubritskaya I. A. (2023) Methodological Approach to Measuring the Capacity of the Global Digital Resources Market: Alternative Indicators of Countries՚ Digital Development. Journal of International Law and International Relations. (1), 64–72 (in Russian).
16. Zubritskaya I. A. (2023) Measuring the Digital Value Added of the National Economy According to InterIndustry Balance Data. Belarusian Economic Journal. (1), 60–74 (in Russian).
17. Zubritskaya I. A. (2019) Industry 4.0: Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Industry of the Republic of Belarus. Digital Transformation. (3), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.38086/2522-9613-2019-3-23-38 (in Russian).Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community. Eurostat. Statistics Explained. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF (Accessed 17 March 2024).
18. National Classifier of the Republic of Belarus 007–2012. Classifier of Products by Types of Economic Activity. Available: https://www.belstat.gov.by/klassifikatory (Accessed 27 March 2024) (in Russian).
19. Aksen E. M. (2018) Modeling of Sectoral Indicators Dynamics with the Application of Utility Theory. Belarusian Economic Journal. (4), 123–147 (in Russian).
20. National Classifier of the Republic of Belarus 005–2011. Types of Economic Activity. Available: www.belstat.gov.by/upload-belstat/upload-belstat-pdf/klassifikatory/OKRB_005-2011_s_izm_1-5.pdf (Accessed 14 March 2024) (in Russian).
21.
Review
For citations:
Zubritskaya I.A. Model of Economic Cyber-Physical Space Focused on Improving National Competitiveness. Digital Transformation. 2025;31(1):5-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2025-31-1-5-12
Views:
24
Email this article 