Analysis of Digital Transformation of Quality Management Processes

In the context of the digital transformation of industry, quality management is faced with the need to revise traditional approaches based on sampling and statistical methods in favor of proactive and predictive models integrated into the enterprise's digital environment. However, the literature lacks a systematic analysis of quality management processes in terms of their suitability for digital transformation, which complicates the selection of effective strategies for implementing intelligent tools. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the systematization of key quality management processes, the identification of key barriers hindering digitalization, and the determination of factors influencing the suitability of processes for automation. Of particular interest is the analysis of the influence of the human factor, problems of integrating heterogeneous information systems, and limitations associated with the formalization of analytical processes on the effectiveness of digital transformation. The author's arguments favor a systems approach to digitalization, which involves preliminary analysis and adjustment of existing processes, phased implementation with an emphasis on management processes, and the development of personnel competencies as a prerequisite for success. The obtained results can be used by managers and quality specialists when planning digital transformation projects at industrial enterprises.

1. Mugutdinov R. M. (2021) System Analysis of Mutual Compliance of the Properties of a Digital Enterprise and Complementary Enterprises Within the Information Environment. Economic Sciences. (200), 82–92. DOI: 10.14451/1.200.82 (in Russian).

2. Nikitina N. V., Skachkov D. Yu., Kolupaev A. S. (2023) Transformation of Project-Process Management of Industrial Enterprises in the Digital Environment. Creative Economy. 17 (11), 4101–4112. DOI: 10.18334/ce.17.11.119506 (in Russian).

3. Bobrovskiy S. M. (2025) Development of the Structure of the Enterprise Quality Management System Processes Together with the Quality Management Processes Information Support System. News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 27 (4), 13–19. DOI: 10.37313/1990-5378-2025-27-4-13-19 (in Russian).

4. Rodionov A. V. (2022) Application of Information Systems in the Processes of Quality Assurance of Organization Management. New in Economic Cybernetics. (2), 42–49 (in Russian).

5. Suslov E. P. (2026) Hybrid Model for Predicting Failures of Video Platforms Based on Statistical Methods and Neural Network Models: A Review of Approaches. Industrial Economics. (3), 171–175. DOI: 10.47576/2949-1886.2026.3.3.022 (in Russian).

6. Sigitov A. A. (2023) Current State and Prospects for the Development of Predictive Analytics Systems in the Field of Construction. Construction and Architecture. 11 (4). DOI: 10.29039/2308-0191-2023-11-4-30-30 (in Russian).

7. Podverbnykh O. E., Sokolova E. L., Samokhvalova S. M. (2024) Implementation of Projects for Digitalization of Human Resource Management of Industrial Enterprises: Factors of Personnel Risks. Creative Economy. 18 (12), 3613–3632. DOI: 10.18334/ce.18.12.122363 (in Russian).

8. Zakharov A. Yu., Myuller D. G. (2025) Human Factor in Digitalization: How to Engage Employees. Scientific Leader. (7), 166–168 (in Russian).

9. Metreveli I. S. (2025) Review of the Current Level of Application of Russian Digital Quality Management Systems Using Artificial Intelligence Capabilities. St. Petersburg Economic Journal. (2), 18–31. DOI: 10.32603/2307-5368-2025-2-18-31 (in Russian).

10. Yusupova D. M. (2023) Aspects of the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence into the Digital Transformation of the Economy and into E-Government Systems. Economy and Society. (4–2), 801–815 (in Russian).

11. Vereshchagin I. A. (2026) Application of Artificial Intelligence in SCADA, MES and ERP Systems. Modern Achievements of Scientific and Technological Progress. (2), 51–53 (in Russian).

12. Kuzhanbaev R. T. (2021) Modern and Promising Methods of Dispatching in Production. Experience and Problems of Implementation and Application of ERP, MES, SCADA and CSRP Systems at Russian Enterprises. Innovation. Science. Education. (47), 1979–1988 (in Russian).