Программное обеспечение и возможности современных языков программирования для изучения биоинформатики и вычислительной вакцинологии новой коронавирусной инфекции

Обзорная статья сосредоточена на вопросах применения программного обеспечения для целей геномики, иммуноинформатики, вычислительной вакцинологии, математической эпидемиологии и филогенеза новой коронавирусной инфекции. Приводится разработанная авторами классификация программного обеспечения для изучения COVID-19.

1. Tomar, Marton. Immunoinformatics. – P [S.l.]: Springer US, 2020. – 409 p.

2. De, R.K., Tomar, N. Immunoinformatics. – New York: Humana Press, 2014. – P xix, 586 pages.

3. Schönbach, C., Ranganathan, S., Brusic, V. Immunoinformatics. – New York: Springer, 2008. – xix, 200 p.

4. Flower, D.R. Bioinformatics for vaccinology. – Chichester, West Sussex, England; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. – 314 p.

5. Prabhakar, H., Kapoor, I., Mahajan, C. Clinical synopsis of COVID-19: evolving and challenging. – 1 online resource (XIV, 260 pages).

6. Chandra, P., Roy, S. Diagnostic strategies for COVID-19 and other coronaviruses. – Singapore: Springer, 2020. – 1 online resource (viii, 199 pages).

7. Saxena, S.K. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutics. – 1 online resource (224 pages).

8. Plotkin, S.A., Orenstein, W.A., Offit, P.A. Plotkin's vaccines. – Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2018. – xxi, 1691 pages.

9. Enjuanes, L. Coronavirus replication and reverse genetics. – Berlin; New York: Springer, 2005. – vii, 257 p.

10. Varshney, D., Singh, M., SpringerLink (Online service). Lyophilized Biologics and Vaccines Modality – Based Approaches. – New York, NY: Springer New York: Imprint: Springer, 2015. – XI, 401 p. 99 illus., 68 illus. in color.

11. Nunnally, B.K., Turula, V.E., Sitrin, R.D., SpringerLink (Online service). Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles, and Control. – Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Imprint: Springer, 2015. – XII, 665 p. 124 illus., 76 illus. in color.

12. Maier, H.J., Bickerton, E., Britton, P. Coronaviruses methods and protocols. – New York: Humana Press; Springer, 2015. – xi, 285 pages.

13. Kiyono, H., Ogra, P.L., McGhee, J.R. Mucosal vaccines. – San Diego: Academic Press, 1996. – xix, 479 p.

14. Vanniasinkam, T., Tikoo, S.K., Samal, S.K. Viral vectors in veterinary vaccine development: a textbook. – Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021. – 1 online resource (xi, 230 pages).

15. Hwang, W., Lei, W., Katritsis, N.M. et al. Current and prospective computational approaches and challenges for developing COVID-19 vaccines // Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. – 2021. epub.

16. Sohail, M.S., Ahmed, S.F., Quadeer, A.A., McKay, M.R. In silico T cell epitope identification for SARS– CoV– 2: Progress and perspectives // Adv Drug Deliv Rev. – 2021. – Vol. 171, – P. 29-47.

17. Noorimotlagh, Z., Karami, C., Mirzaee, S.A. et al. Immune and bioinformatics identification of T cell and B cell epitopes in the protein structure of SARS–CoV–2: A systematic review // Int Immunopharmacol. – 2020. – Vol. 86. – P. 106738.

18. Baruah, V., Bose, S. Immunoinformatics aided identification of T cell and B cell epitopes in the surface glycoprotein of 2019 nCoV // Journal of medical virology. – 2020. – Vol. 92, No. 5. – P. 495-500.

19. Oliveira, S.C., de Magalhães, M.T., Homan, E.J. Immunoinformatic Analysis of SARS–CoV–2 Nucleocapsid Protein and Identification of COVID–19 Vaccine Targets // Frontiers in immunology. – 2020. – Vol. 11. – P. 2758.

20. Feng, Y., Qiu, M., Zou, S. et al. Multi–epitope vaccine design using an immunoinformatics approach for 2019 novel coronavirus in China (SARS–CoV–2) // BioRxiv. – 2020. – Vol. 1, No. 1. – P. 1-12.

21. Wang, X., Xu, W., Tong, D. et al. A chimeric multi– epitope DNA vaccine elicited specific antibody response against severe acute respiratory syndrome – associated coronavirus which attenuated the virulence of SARS–CoV in vitro // Immunology letters. – 2008. – Vol. 119, No. 1– 2. – P. 71-77.

22. Belikova Y., Samsonov Y., Abakushina E. Modern vaccines and coronavirus infections. Research and Practical Medicine Journal, 2020, Vol 7, No. 4. pp. 135-154. (In Russian).

23. Kononov A., Mishchenko V., Dumova B. et al. Antigenic properties of bovine coronavirus vaccine with various adjuvants. Proceedings of the Federal Center for Animal Health, 2009, Vol 7, pp. 50-55. (In Russian).

24. Kharchenko E. P. Coronavirus SARS-Cov-2: the complexity of pathogenesis, the search for vaccines and future pandemics. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prevention, 2020, Vol 19, No. 3. pp. 4-20. (In Russian).

25. Ozharovskaya T., Zubkova O., Dolzhikova I. et al. Immunogenicity of various forms of glycoprotein S of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Acta Naturae (Russian version), 2019, Vol 11, No. 1 (40). pp. 38-47. (In Russian).

26. Chepurnov A. A., Sharshov K. A., Kazachinskaya E. I. et al. Antigenic properties of SARS-CoV-2 / human / RUS / Nsk-FRCFTM-1/202 coronavirus isolate isolated from a patient in Novosibirsk. Journal of Infectology, 2020, Vol 12, No. 3. pp. 42-50. (In Russian).

27. Kharchenko E.P. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus: features of structural proteins, contagiousness and possible immune collisions. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prevention, 2020, Vol 19, No. 2. pp. 13-30. (In Russian).

28. Titova M.A. Approaches to modeling immunogenic peptides: author. dis. for a job. learned. step. Cand. chem. Sciences: 02.00.10 / Titova Maya Adolfovna. - M., 2003, 23 p. M., 2003..(In Russian).

29. Hu, T., Li, J., Zhou, H. et al. Bioinformatics resources for SARS–CoV–2 discovery and surveillance // Briefings in Bioinformatics. – 2021. – Vol. 22, No. 2. – P. 631-641.

30. Hufsky, F., Lamkiewicz, K., Almeida, A. et al. Computational strategies to combat COVID–19: useful tools to accelerate SARS–CoV–2 and coronavirus research // Briefings in Bioinformatics. – 2020. – Vol. 22, No. 2. – P. 642-663.

31. Kangabam, R., Sahoo, S., Ghosh, A. et al. Next– generation computational tools and resources for coronavirus research: From detection to vaccine discovery // Computers in biology and medicine. – 2020. – Vol. 1, No. 1. – P. 104-115.

32. Kiyotani, K., Toyoshima, Y., Nemoto, K., Nakamura, Y. Bioinformatic prediction of potential T cell epitopes for SARS-Cov–2 // Journal of human genetics. – 2020. – Vol. 65, No. 7. – P. 569-575.

33. Ogishi, M., Yotsuyanagi, H. Quantitative Prediction of the Landscape of T Cell Epitope Immunogenicity in Sequence Space // Frontiers in Immunology. – 2019. – Vol. 10, No. 827. – P. 1-20.

34. Ong, E., Wang, H., Wong, M.U. et al. Vaxign– ML: supervised machine learning reverse vaccinology model for improved prediction of bacterial protective antigens // Bioinformatics. – 2020. – Vol. 36, No. 10. – P. 3185-3191.

35. Xiang, Z., He, Y. Genome– wide prediction of vaccine targets for human herpes simplex viruses using Vaxign reverse vaccinology // BMC Bioinformatics. – 2013. – Vol. 14, No.1. – P. S2.

36. He, Y., Xiang, Z., Mobley, H.L. Vaxign: the first web– based vaccine design program for reverse vaccinology and applications for vaccine development // J Biomed Biotechnol. – 2010. – Vol. 10, No. Epub 2010 Jul 4. – P. 297505.

37. Vita, R., Overton, J.A., Greenbaum, J.A. et al. The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3.0 // Nucleic Acids Res. –Vol. 43, No. 1. – P. D405-12.

38. El– Manzalawy, Y., Dobbs, D., Honavar, V. Predicting linear B–cell epitopes using string kernels // J Mol Recognit. – 2008. – Vol. 21, No. 4. – P. 243-55.

39. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation // Bioinformatics. – 2014. – Vol. 30, No. 14. – P. 2068-9.

40. Huerta-Cepas, J., Szklarczyk, D., Heller, D. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses // Nucleic Acids Res. – 2018. – Vol. 47, No. D1. – P. D309-D314.

41. Jones, P., Binns, D., Chang, H.Y. et al. InterProScan 5: genome–scale protein function classification // Bioinformatics. 2014. – Vol. 30, No. 9. – P. 1236-40.

42. Mulder, N., Apweiler, R. InterPro and InterProScan: tools for protein sequence classification and comparison // Methods Mol Biol. – 2007. – Vol.396. – P. 59-70.

43. Syed, A., Upton, C. Java GUI for InterProScan (JIPS): a tool to help process multiple InterProScans and perform ortholog analysis // BMC Bioinformatics. – 2006. – Vol. 7. – P. 462.

44. Quevillon, E., Silventoinen, V., Pillai, S. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier // Nucleic Acids Res. – 2005. – Vol. 33, No. 1. – P. W116- 20.

45. Katoh, K., Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability // Mol Biol Evol. – 2013. – Vol. 30, No. 4. – P. 772-80.

46. Katoh, K., Frith, M.C. Adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment using MAFFT and LAST // Bioinformatics. – 2012. – Vol. 28, No. 23. – P. 3144-6.

47. Katoh, K., Toh, H. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program // Bioinformatics. – 2010. – Vol. 26, No. 15. – P. 1899-900.

48. Katoh, K., Asimenos, G., Toh, H. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT // Methods Mol Biol. – 2009. – Vol. 537. – P. 39-64.

49. Hung, C.L., Lin, Y.S., Lin, C.Y. et al. CUDA ClustalW: An efficient parallel algorithm for progressive multiple sequence alignment on Multi– GPUs // Comput Biol Chem. – Vol. 58. – P. 62-8.

50. Hung, J.H., Weng, Z. Sequence Alignment and Homology Search with BLAST and ClustalW // Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016. – Vol. 16, No. 11. – P. 1-10.

51. Vangala, R.K., Singh, L., Gupta, R.P. BioParishodhana: A novel graphical interface integrating BLAST, ClustalW, primer3 and restriction digestion tools // Bioinformation. – 2012. – Vol. 8, No. 13. – P. 639-43.

52. Zaal, D., Nota, B. ADOMA: A Command Line Tool to Modify ClustalW Multiple Alignment Output // Mol Inform. – 2016. – Vol. 35, No. 1. – P. 42-4.

53. Darling, A.E., Treangen, T.J., Messeguer, X., Perna, N.T. Analyzing patterns of microbial evolution using the mauve genome alignment system // Methods Mol Biol. – 2007. – Vol. 396. – P. 135-52.

54. Darling, A.C., Mau, B., Blattner, F.R., Perna, N.T. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements // Genome Res. – 2004. – Vol. 14, No. 7. – P. 1394-403.

55. Angiuoli, S.V., Salzberg, S.L. Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes // Bioinformatics. – 2010. – Vol. 27, No. 3. – P. 33-42.

56. Cleemput, S., Dumon, W., Fonseca, V. et al. Genome Detective Coronavirus Typing Tool for rapid identification and characterization of novel coronavirus genomes // Bioinformatics. – Vol. 36, No. 11. – P. 3552-3555.

57. Vilsker, M., Moosa, Y., Nooij, S. et al. Genome Detective: an automated system for virus identification from high-throughput sequencing data // Bioinformatics. – 2018. – Vol. 35, No. 5. – P. 871-873.

58. Gupta, S., Kapoor, P., Chaudhary, K. et al. Peptide toxicity prediction // Methods Mol Biol. – Vol. 1268. – P. 143-57.

59. Gupta, S., Kapoor, P., Chaudhary, K. et al. In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins // PLoS One. – 2013. – Vol. 8, No. 9. – P. e. 73957.

60. Krutz, N.L., Winget, J., Ryan, C.A. et al. Proteomic and Bioinformatic Analyses for the Identification of Proteins With Low Allergenic Potential for Hazard Assessment // Toxicol Sci. – – Vol. 170, No. 1. – P. 210-222.

61. Maurer– Stroh, S., Krutz, N.L., Kern, P.S. et al. AllerCatPro– prediction of protein allergenicity potential from the protein sequence // Bioinformatics. – 2019. – Vol. 35, No. 17. – P. 3020-3027.

62. Sharma, N., Patiyal, S., Dhall, A. et al. AlgPred 2.0: an improved method for predicting allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes // Brief Bioinform. – 2020. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 1-7.

63. Neeharika, D., Sunkar, S. Computational approach for the identification of putative allergens from Cucurbitaceae family members // J Food Sci Technol. – 2021. – Vol 58, No. 1. – P. 267-280.

64. Sircar, G., Saha, B., Bhattacharya, S.G., Saha, S. In silico prediction of allergenic proteins // Methods Mol Biol. – 2014. Vol. 1184. – P. 375-88.

65. Saha, S., Raghava, G.P. AlgPred: prediction of allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes // Nucleic Acids Res. 2006. – Vol. 34, No. Web Server issue. – P. W. 202-9.

66. Pagadala, N.S., Syed, K., Tuszynski, J. Software for molecular docking: a review // Biophys Rev. – 2017. – Vol. 9, No. 2. – P. 91-102.

67. Grote, A., Hiller, K., Scheer, M. et al. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host // Nucleic Acids Res. – 2005. – Vol. 33, No. Web Server issue. – P. W526-31.

68. Zheng, W., Zhang, C., Bell, E.W., Zhang, Y. I – TASSER gateway: A protein structure and function prediction server powered by XSEDE // Future Gener Comput Syst. – 2019. – Vol. 99, – P. 73-85.

69. Roy, A., Kucukural, A., Zhang, Y. I – TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction // Nat Protoc. – 2010. – Vol. 5, No. 4. – P. 725-38.

70. Zhang, Y. I– TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction // BMC Bioinformatics. – 2008. – Vol. 9. – P. 40.

71. Raborn, R.T., Brendel, V.P. Using RAMPAGE to Identify and Annotate Promoters in Insect Genomes // Methods Mol Biol. – 2019. – Vol. 1858, No. 1. – P. 99-116.

72. Collatz, M., Mock, F., Hölzer, M. et al. EpiDope: A Deep neural network for linear B–cell epitope prediction // bioRxiv. 2020. – No. 1. – P. 1-8.

73. Suprun, M., Ellis, R.J., Sampson, H.A., Suárez– Fariñas, M. bbeaR: an R package and framework for epitope – specific antibody profiling // Bioinformatics. – 2021. – Vol. 37, No. 1. – P. 131-133.

74. Ogishi, M., Yotsuyanagi, H. Quantitative prediction of the landscape of T cell epitope immunogenicity in sequence space // Frontiers in Immunology. – 2019. – Vol .10. – P. 827.

75. Pittard, W.S., Li, S. The Essential Toolbox of Data Science: Python, R, Git, and Docker // Methods Mol Biol. – 2020. – Vol. 2104, No. 1. – P. 265-311.

76. Kwon, C., Kim, J., Ahn, J. DockerBIO: web application for efficient use of bioinformatics Docker images // PeerJ. – 2018. – Vol. 6, No. 1. – P. e. 5954.

77. Garofoli, A., Paradiso, V., Montazeri, H. et al. PipeIT: A Singularity Container for Molecular Diagnostic Somatic Variant Calling on the Ion Torrent Next– Generation Sequencing Platform // J. Mol Diagn. – 2019. – Vol. 21, No. 5. – P. 884-894.

78. Samdani, A., Vetrivel, U. POAP: A GNU parallel based multithreaded pipeline of open babel and AutoDock suite for boosted high throughput virtual screening // Comput Biol Chem. – 2018. – Vol. 74, No. 1. – P. 39-48.

79. Красильников, А.П. Микробиологический словарь-справочник. – 2– е изд., доп. и перераб. – Мн.: ООО "Асар", 1999. – 397 c.