Preview

Digital Transformation

Advanced search

Automated System for Generating and Evaluating Tests

https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2023-29-3-25-33

Abstract

The importance of knowledge testing in the educational process and its role in identifying gaps in students’ knowledge and modernizing education are noted. The contextual links between the concept of quality and educational testing, the representation of knowledge about the subject area using the Martynov triad are considered. The main focus is on the semantic web, where concepts represent testable knowledge elements. Concepts are classified into different types depending on the information they contain, such as general textual concept, list/classification/hierarchy, program code, formulaic concept, causal concept, and others. The generation of test questions is considered, the QueTabAI system is described, which automatically generates questions based on the presented knowledge about the subject area. Methods for generating questions with their compilation on the basis of grammatical analysis of the text are given. The signs or criteria that are identified through testing are listed. Various aspects and methods of feature formation are studied, allowing to make a decision on the need to fill in the knowledge gaps and modernize the educational process.

About the Authors

S. A. Migalevich
Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics
Belarus

Migalevich Sergey Aleksandrovich -  Postgraduate, Head of the Center for Informatization and Innovative Development

220013, Minsk, Platonova St., 39

Tel.: +375 17 293-23-20



O. V. German
Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics
Belarus

German O. V. - Cand. of Sci., Associate Professor at the Department of Information Technologies in Automated  System

220013, Minsk, Platonova St., 39



References

1. APA (2014). The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Retrieved July 2, 2017. 230.

2. Automated Quality Assurance of Educational Testing. July 2018 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education.

3. Automated E-Learning Quality Evaluation. International Conference on E-Learning. Sept. 2015, Berlin.

4. Powers Sh. Practical RDF. O’Reilly, 2003. 350.

5. Lamy J.-B. (2021) Ontologies with Python. Programming Ontology OWL2 with Python. Apress. 340.

6. Lamy J.-B. (2017) Owlready: Ontology-Oriented Programming in Python with Automatic Classification and High Level Constructs for Biomedical Ontologies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Elsevier. (80), 11–28. https://ff10.1016/j.artmed.2017.07.002ff.ffhal-01592746f.

7. Martynov V. V. (1977) Universal Semantic Code. Moscow, Sсience Publ. 192 (in Russian).

8. Question Generator QueTabAI. Available: https://www.quetab.com/ai/question/generator.

9. Lomte R. et al. (2021) Automatic Question Generation from Text: a Survey. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 8 (1), 634–640.

10. Gurin N. I., German O. V. (2015) Computer Training Systems in Publishing. In 2 Parts. Part 2. Software Processing of the Knowledge Base. Minsk, Belarusian State Technological University. 192 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Migalevich S.A., German O.V. Automated System for Generating and Evaluating Tests. Digital Transformation. 2023;29(3):25-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35596/1729-7648-2023-29-3-25-33

Views: 503


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2522-9613 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2822 (Online)